2.18.2011

REVIEW: Unknown (Jaume Collet-Serra, 2011)

I hope you've packed a hefty pair of suspenders 'cause pesky old disbelief is going to need 'em. When not stumbling through messes of unpronounced action we're rolling with logical leaps, particularly regarding standard security procedure. Strangers without identification are allowed high clearance simply via turned backs. International undercover assassins leave paper trails while fumbling with the operation of their own devices. Meanwhile these characters' dialogue is so rigidly cliché I'm surprised we never hear the phrase "follow that taxi!" All this and an undermining dispassion are sure to disappoint fans of 2008's moderately surprising Neeson vehicle, "Taken".

I suppose I'm being a bit harsh on what is by all rights "just a thriller". Subsequently I suppose things'd be dandy if "Unknown" were at least some form of thrilling. I propose a new subgenre: twisters! The key reason to see any of these movies - even director Jaume Collet-Serra's last outing "The Orphan", for example - is to try and figure out the inevitable (and in this case, essentially promised) twist ending. Then, again, "Unknown" isn't the best platform for its fellow twisters to defect from as it fails to engage the mind. There are clues, all be them noncontextual, along with a clumsy tightrope act between rationality and insanity, but to boil it down is to realize the desired information isn't discoverable. It's simply withheld. Our twists come to us in the form of blatant, unrewarding exposition whenever the filmmakers deem it timely. At least in "Shutter Island", which features perhaps the most exposition-heavy twist reveal in cinema history (one character goes as far as to pull out a chart; 'nuff said), we're tugged to and fro throughout in spite of being 99% sure we've solved the mystery.

2 comments:

  1. It's safe to say that I'll most likely be staying away from this one, partially considering the fact I've never been able to stand Neeson's portrayal of American protagonists and mostly because the film sounds pretty abortion-esque.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Particularly considering the fact that Berlin is neither here nor there in the picture, Neeson should have just gone Irish and his performance might have prospered (relatively). There's only so much you can blame on a poor script, but Neeson probably has the least to work with. "Who am I? Who am I? Who am I? Do you trust me? Who am I?" Yeah, you won't be missing much!

    ReplyDelete

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...